Used internationally for evaluating or deciding which guidelines could be recommended for use in practice or to inform health policy decisions.) (A 23-item instrument for as sessing th e quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines. ![]() Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE-II). When evaluating clinical practice guidelines:ĪGREE Research Trust (ART) (2013). (Reporting guidelines for writing up a study comparing the accuracy of competing diagnostic methods) ![]() STAndards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) Statement. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PRISMA replaces the previous QUORUM statement guidelines): Liberati, A, Altman, D, Moher, D, et al. ![]() PRISMA (Guideline on how to perform and write-up a systematic review and/or meta-analysis of the outcomes reported in multiple clinical trials of therapeutic interventions. (Tracking and listing over 550 reporting guidelines for various different study types including Randomised trials, Systematic reviews, Study protocols, Diagnostic/prognostic studies, Case reports, Clinical practice guidelines, Animal pre-clinical studies, etc). GUIDELINES FOR HOW TO CARRY OUT AN ANALYTICAL REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE RESEARCHĮnhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) network.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |